« The kinetic art of Tom Haney | Main | Sunday Poem »
The comments to this entry are closed.
Kelly Link & Gavin Grant: The Best of Lady Churchill's Rosebud Wristlet
Michael Scott: The Alchemyst (The Secrets of the Immortal Nicholas Flamel)
Jack Dann and Gardner Dozois, editors: Wizards: Magical Tales From the Masters of Modern Fantasy
Thedora Goss & Delia Sherman, editors: Interfictions: An Anthology of Interstitial Writing
Marina Warner: Phantasmagoria: Spirit Visions, Metaphors, and Media
Dorothy & Thomas Hoobler: The Monsters: Mary Shelley and the Curse of Frankenstein
Louise Downie: Don't Kiss Me: The Art of Claude Cahun And Marcel Moore
Susan C. Power: Art of the Cherokee: Prehistory to the Present
Patricia Briggs: Blood Bound (Mercy Thompson Series, Book 2)
Patricia C. Wrede and Caroline Stevermer: The Mislaid Magician
Hmmm, Let's see. Borderland/Bordertown book covers or Tony Blair ...
[flipping a coin]
Heads !
A-yup, he should stick with book covers.
Posted by: Rob Blake | April 25, 2008 at 07:33 AM
Sorry, Rob, I have to disagree -- as much I loved the Bordertown book covers, I think this is a really interesting and edgy portrait of a controversial Prime Minister. (Actually, I think it's a killer portrait even if the man were not famous.)
Posted by: Midori | April 25, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Phil won 3rd place in the National Portrait Gallery's annual competition in 2000, and then 2nd prize (for a self-portrait) in 2001. This work gained him many admirers in the U.K., which eventually led to the Blair commission. They are astonishing paintings when viewed in person.
You can see the self-portrait here, if you scroll part-way down this article:
http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1395000/images/_1397582_bpsourcex150.jpg&imgrefurl=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/1397582.stm&h=180&w=150&sz=8&hl=en&start=11&sig2=TUMdLjGK476jlXrsiZjnfA&tbnid=WECel9t6muOGTM:&tbnh=101&tbnw=84&ei=8BcSSLDdGJyYefyAgakC&prev=/images%3Fq%3DPhil%2BHale%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG
And here's my favorite of his portraits, which is in the National Portrait Gallery's permanent collection:
http://www.npg.org.uk/live/search/portrait.asp?LinkID=mp61493&rNo=0&role=art
Phil has been living in London now for many years, but he used to live in Boston, where he shared a studio with Rick Berry on the floor below our original Endicott Studio space (which I shared with Rick's wife Sheila) on Endicott Street. I used to love wandering down to their studio late at night, where they plied me with whiskey and taught me how to paint...
Posted by: Terri Windling | April 25, 2008 at 10:57 AM
"...He should stick with book covers."
What a narrow-minded comment. And a very political one. I loved those Bordertown covers, too -- but why would I want to suggest that Phil Hale limit himself?
Those are intriguing portraits -- as is his self-description as a documentarian -- and also intriguing to envision the process of painting a portrait in "slow-time."
You go, Phil!
Thanks for posting this, Terri.
Robert
Posted by: Robert | April 25, 2008 at 02:44 PM
Robert, I think Rob's comment was meant tongue-in-cheek -- and wit sometimes falls flat on the internet, where it's not modified by tone of voice, expression, etc. So personally (and in order to keep our usual tone of civility on this blog) I'm inclined to cut him some slack.
But thank you nonetheless for sticking up for Phil's portrait art. I agree that his portraits are amazing; they really make you *think*. I've lived in England for almost 20 years now, and I'm personally no fan of Tony Blair and his policies (don't get me started, since a Mythic Arts forum isn't the proper place for a discussion of British politics!), but for me Phil is right when he says this portrait "humanizes" Blair. I remember the fresh-faced young man he was when he first took office ...and the sheer exhaustion on his face in Phil's portrait speaks volumes about his turbulent years as PM. It speaks volumes about the painter's skill as well.
Posted by: Terri Winding | April 26, 2008 at 01:18 AM
Terri,
Rob's comment caught me in an annoyed moment, and I regretted the 'narrow-minded' comment right after I sent it. So...I take back that comment.
I'm no Blair fan, either -- and think Phil's portrait, does give a glimpse of the man behind the office. And too, think it also speaks truth to power, in a subtle way. Definitely not the typical PM portrait.
Your posting lead me to taking a major surf through the National Portrait Gallery's web pages, and I thoroughly enjoyed myself. Was there in person long ago in the mid-70s...
Robert
Posted by: Robert | April 26, 2008 at 02:22 PM
Oh I loved those covers.
The paintings are so different, I was not expecting anything like that.
I still reread my borderland books, they were just the right magic at the right time in my life.
Celina
Posted by: Celina | April 26, 2008 at 07:01 PM
That is really powerful, and his use of light ambivalent. I'm glad they're still commissioning painted portraits in a digital age. And even more that we can share them via technology.
Posted by: Andrea | April 27, 2008 at 09:46 AM